Position 1
XGID=-a-B--EaC---dC--ac-cb---B-:0:0:1:22:0:0:0:7:10
Position 2
XGID=-a-B-aE-C---dC--ac-cb---B-:0:0:1:22:0:0:0:7:10
1 Like
Hello Jason and many thanks for all of these interesting positions.
Mhhh, I would not hit loose on the 5 while our opponent has a better prime structure than we do. If we get hit back, we are in a dire position.
But I would consider hitting on the 7, and 24/22 to round it off. Even if we get hit back, we have a return shot and in all likeliness we ar going to make that anchor.
So
#1: 13/7* 24/22
#2: 24/22(2) 6/4(2)
1 Like
Hm.... on the first position I see that 13/7* 24/22 duplicates 6s but somehow I dislike having nothing than hit. 24/22(2) 6/4(2) improves on both sides of the board, putting pressure on two blots + having a modest racing advantage.
Stragely I'm more inclined to hit with #2 but I still take 13/7* 24/22 (I hope at least 1 is right 
)
LOL.....There is a reason I don't play BMAB but build a bot .....
Position 1:
1. Rollout¹ 6/4(2) 3/1*(2) eq:+0.302
Player: 52.56% (G:29.77% B:0.83%)
Opponent: 47.44% (G:12.25% B:0.83%)
Confidence: ±0.014 (+0.288..+0.316) - [100.0%]
Duration: 31 minutes 40 seconds
2. Rollout¹ 24/22(2) 6/4(2) eq:-0.024 (-0.326)
Player: 47.73% (G:17.03% B:0.52%)
Opponent: 52.27% (G:11.52% B:0.62%)
Confidence: ±0.011 (-0.035..-0.013) - [0.0%]
Duration: 41 minutes 01 second
3. Rollout¹ 24/22 13/7* eq:-0.173 (-0.475)
Player: 44.91% (G:17.58% B:0.96%)
Opponent: 55.09% (G:16.13% B:0.85%)
Confidence: ±0.013 (-0.186..-0.160) - [0.0%]
Duration: 43 minutes 30 seconds
¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 4-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller+
Search interval: Huge
Position 2:
1. XG Roller++ 24/22(2) 6/4(2) eq:+0.066
Player: 49.92% (G:16.39% B:0.56%)
Opponent: 50.08% (G:10.91% B:0.41%)
2. XG Roller++ 6/4(2) 3/1*(2) eq:-0.005 (-0.071)
Player: 47.66% (G:20.40% B:0.46%)
Opponent: 52.34% (G:13.64% B:0.65%)
Technically an apples to oranges comparison, since I rolled out the first one and not the second, but I'm sure it's not different.
JLee